writing question 2

I disagree with the idea that the possessing the ability to relate well with students is more important than excellent knowledge of the subject being taught for a teacher. There are several reasons why I disagree with that idea.

First, teachers' job is to educate their students with their knowledge. The ability to relate well with their students is something a counselor should possess, not a teacher. That's why the board of eudcation gives an award to a teacher with an excellent knowledge of the subject they teach. Teachers who can get along with their students but have no knowledge can be popular and be liked by his or her students, however, I don't consider a teacher with no knowledge a good teacher.

Second, students go to schools because they want to learn knowledge from their teachers. I knew a math teacher who was well known among other mathematics teachers. Some students always complained how he never entertain his students which made many of his students to fall asleep. Nevertheless, all of his classes were all full even before the semester began because many students who were eager to learn already booked in. He won the Apples prizea couple of times and that enables students to firmly believe in his way of teaching.

Thirdly, teachers are responsible for conceding their knowledge to their next generation. Teachers already had an experience of getting advantaged education from college. Teachers should not let that privilege become useless and work less. We all learn because we want to become the better person that his world needs. Students will also eventutally grow up to be influencing other people and teachers should voluntarility be their students' role models.

For conclusion, I think the most important quality of a teacher must have is an excellent knowledge of the subject they teach, not an ability to relate well with their students.

Source: ETS writing question 2 example